ARCHITECTURE DEVELOP ALL THE TIME, THERE ARE A LOT OF ARCHITECTURE’S STYLE FROM THE PAST. EACH STYLE DEVELOP FROM BELIEVE, ENVIRONMENT, CULTURE. ALL OF THAT CALLED CONTEXT. BUT IN MY PERSPECTIVE, SOME STYLE JUST TRY TO BREAK OUT FROM OLD ARCHITECTURE STYLE FOR THE DIFFERENCE EVEN THEY ARE STILL GOOD SUCH AS MODERN STYLE TO POST- MODERN STYLE.
I KNOW BASIC REASON OF MODERN THAT ARE SIMPLE, SYMMETRY AND GEOMETRY BUT I DON’T KNOW THE DEEP REASON OF IT “WHY SIMPLE AND GEOMETRY”. WHY THEY CHANGE INTO ASYMMETRY AND ORGANIC FORM WHILE MODERN STYLE IS GOOD. IT MIGHT BECAUSE PROGRESSION OF TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES POSSIBILITY IN TERM OF CONSTRUCTION. IN ARCHITECTS PERSPECTIVE, THEY WANT NEW THINGS FOR OUTING FROM THE PLATITUDE ARCHITECTURE. IF WE THINK ABOUT USER PERSPECTIVE, THEY MIGHT NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT FORM CHANGING WHILE THE OLD STYLE CAN USE VERY WELL AND THEY MIGHT NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS ARCHITECT INTEND TO COMMUNICATE TO PEOPLE. PEOPLE WON’T PERCEIVE SPACE CLEARLY IF THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THE ARCHITECT’S INTENTION.
ALL I HAVE SAID DOESN’T MEAN THE FORM CHANGING IS BAD THING. IT LIKE ARCHITECTURE IS GROWING SO, IT SHOULD HAVE LIFE AND MOTION AS ORGANIC FORM AND, IT ISN’T BE MOTIONLESS AS SIMPLE & SYMMETRY FORM.
เง้ออ..ภาษาอังกฤษท้างงหน้าเลย หงายหลังเลย ขี้เกียจอ่าน เหอะๆ
ตอบลบเรียบๆ ดูดี ^^
ทำไมไม่อ่านละ
ตอบลบขี้โกงนี่หว่า