EMPTY FORM

The first time I heard about empty form, I did not think about the space that form is fixed but function could be change to anything. I think about "no form = form".

I have no idea that my understanding is right or wrong. The empty is nothing so, I think the word "empty" has relationship with "Everything is nothing" space itself should not be fixed. It should have the possibility to transform itself to serve or support the function and program that change in the next 20-40 years. In fact, this idea might be only imagination because how can we build the space that can transform itself into other form.

As I said, I don't think that fixed form where the program and function can change depend on user need is the empty form because if empty form has that character, every space can be the empty form? I can change my bedroom into library in the next ten years. My high-school's canteen already changed into teacher room without changing the form so, This is empty form? Now, I'm not sure about what the empty form is. We can make empty form by changing only the furniture? This is very hard topic to understand in this time for me.

other things are about "And architecture / Or architecture" This is hard to know what is one architecture be. It will be and-architecture if the existing function [architecture itself] still remain and new function occur? And if existing function [architecture itself still remain] gone and new function come, this will be or-architecture?